TUG Home | TUGBBS Online Forums | Resort Reviews | Classified Ads | TUG HELP | Advice | Join TUG  
Timeshare Users Group

TUG Banner Ads .. click for details on this banner program

Free Resort ReviewsFree Resort Reviews 

Your Location: Timeshare Users Group Advice: Wall Street Journal - Timeshare Listing Fees  |updated: 1/29/08

The Wall Street Journal

Florida Journal
Wednesday, March 11, 1998
By Alina Matas
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

Timeshare Listing Fees Spark Suit:

Florida Regulators, responding to complaints  from sellers of timeshare condos, are suing  a Texas real-estate company that collects advance fees to list timeshares for sale.

The State Department of Business and Professional Regulation sued Stroman Realty, Inc. in Leon County Circuit Court in January, charging the Conroe, Texas company with breaking a 1995  Florida law that prohibits collecting advance fees to list a timeshare for sale.  The lawsuit also accuses the company of operating without a Florida broker’s license, and is asking the court to stop the company’s activities in the state, order it to pay restitution to customers who paid the fee and pay the state a penalty of $10,000 for each advance fee collected.

The suit names nine people who claim they paid the fee and didn’t get any results, but state regulators allege hundreds more probably also paid.  The suit is seeking reimbursement for any consumer who paid the fee for advertising of a Florida-located timeshare

Unkept Promises

“We fell for the sales pitch.” says Myna Luse, a widow from Michigan who paid $489-Stroman’s standard fee to list her Daytona Beach Timeshare in 1994.  It hasn’t sold yet.  “They led you to believe they had alot of buyers,” says Ms. Luse who’s trying to sell the timeshare on her own.  “But I’m not planning on anything happening any more.”

Under a timeshare, purchasers buy long-term rights to vacation resorts for a specified period each year.  Owners who look to sell their timeshares say they are often unable to occupy them during the timeshare period.  They also cite hundreds of dollars in annual maintenance fees.

At issue in the case is the question of whether a resale market exists for timeshares, and whether customers who pay third-party brokers a few hundred dollars to tap into that market are getting their money’s worth.

“To take money from someone on the promise of a sale when their isn’t a resale market is questionable.” says Laura Glenn, chief of the bureau of timeshare within the Department of  Business and Professional Regulation which is in Tallahassee.

Stroman defends its practice and says its fee is necessary to maintain its computer network, which gives it access to potential buyers world-wide.  “Not all the properties sell,” says Wayne Stroman, President of the Company.  “There’s no guarantee and we don’t have a crystal ball.”

Florida Is Also Sued

Stroman also says Florida Regulators sought out the few Floridians who have complained against the company, and has filed its own lawsuit against the state, in U.S. district Court in Houston in February.  The company alleges Florida’s statute is “an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.”

The company argues that because its business involves buyers and sellers from all states, it shouldn’t be required to be a licensed broker in every state, nor to abide by the local laws of each state. Instead it should be enough that it abides by Texas law, where it is licensed as a broker and where its fees are permitted.(Stroman only has its offices in Texas, but it does business in other states by marketing through the Internet and through direct-mail and newspaper advertisements.)

The dispute is erupting at a time when the timeshare industry is booming, thanks in part to the new timeshares being built by reputable hotel chains such as Marriot International, Inc. and Hilton Hotels Corp.  Industry spokesman say the dollar volume of timesharing has risen an average of  13.8% annually from 1992 through 1996.  Florida’s 284 timeshare condos account for one fourth of the total U.S. market.

But the industries boom hasn’t eliminated all its problems.  Many sellers of timeshares have found that they typically have to settle for far less that what they paid for them. “Its not something we sell as an investment.” says Christopher Larsen, Spokesman for the American Resort Developer Association, a Washington D.C. trade group that  represents the timeshare developers.

Problems In Other States

Stoman’s lawsuit also names as a defendant the state of California.  In September, that states Department of Real-Estate filed an administrative order compelling Stroman to stop its practices there. “In our view there’s a violation of state law,” says Larry Alamo, attorney for the department.  California law allows companies to collect advance fees only after they have all relevant advertising material and paperwork approved by the state, and the state impounds the collected fees until they’re expended for the benefit of the people for whom they were collected.

“State regulators have run amok and are trying to impose their laws on people throughout the country.” says Mr. Stroman.  But Stroman is having problems in its own home state of Texas as well, where the attorney general is investigating the company for complaints from “consumers dissatisfied with misleading and deceptive statements regarding the effectiveness of the companies services,” a spokeswoman for the attorney general says.

“We do what we tell people we’re going to do, and that’s market the property in the most effective means there is, “ responds Mr. Stroman. The people who complain, he adds, are those ”whose expectations are too high” about the price or the speed at which the property will sell.

The Florida legislature outlawed collection of timeshare listing fees in 1995, in response to numerous complaints from owners who had paid such fees to third-party brokers, but weren’t getting any buy offers.

The lawsuit against Stroman will be the first case to test the Florida law and its applicability to an out-of-state broker, but the state may follow with more lawsuits against other brokers who collect fees from would-be sellers, even if the fees are collected for purposes other than the listing itself, says Ms. Glenn.

For example, some brokers charge owners an advance fee to appraise their units and determine how much it is worth in the resale market.  The state is investigating such companies to determine whether the appraisal fee is just another name for an advance fee, says Ms. Glenn.

Brokers who charge such appraisal fees say they are tired of getting questioned and subpoenaed by the state, and one of them last month filed suit against Florida in Orange County Circuit Court, asking the court to stop the state from demanding documents.

“They’re saying you can’t take a fee to appraise a timeshare,” says Jim Gillis, an Orlando attorney who represents Tom Lugen, a broker who operates Daytona Beach based Century 21 Timeshare Resales, and Carol Tennant, owner of Vacation Destinations, Inc., a timeshare exchange club that refers would-be sellers to Mr. Lugen.  “There is nothing to say you cannot pay somebody to appraise a timeshare.”

Caught on the middle of such technicalities are people like Chrostopher Teti, an Orlando engineer who concedes he wasn’t a fan of timeshares until he bought a timeshare in Daytona Beach only to realize later the resort didn’t rent it out for him when he couldn’t use it, as it had promised- and then subsequently paid $495 to list with Stroman, only to get no results.

So when he received materials from Century 21 Timeshare Resales, and called to inquire, the appraisal fee just made him skeptical and he decided to not use the broker.  “I figured I was better off doing it myself,” says Mr. Teti.  “We’ve lost enough money.”

   TUG Home | TUGBBS Online Forums | Resort Reviews | Classified Ads | TUG HELP | Advice | Join TUG  

Send comments/feedback by email to: tug@tug2.net Timeshare Users Group

Copyright 1993-2008
PO Box 1442, Orange Park, Fl 32067
Phone: (904) 298-3185


Homepage updated Jan 29, 2008  by B. Rogers - Send email regarding this page to tug@tug2.net